Cryptocurrencies are being adopted across borders at an unprecedented pace, but with that comes a complex web of regulations that coin developers can’t afford to ignore. Each country has its own legal stance—some offer clear frameworks that support innovation, while others impose restrictions or operate in legal grey areas. For developers planning a global presence, understanding these diverse regulatory environments is critical. This guide offers a detailed country-by-country overview of current crypto laws, enforcement trends, and compliance requirements—equipping you with the clarity needed to move forward confidently in any jurisdiction.
North America: Balancing Innovation and Regulation
A. United States: A Complex Regulatory Environment
Key Regulatory Bodies and Their Roles
- Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): The SEC oversees the issuance and sale of securities, including digital assets that meet the definition of securities. This means cryptocurrencies considered securities must be registered with the SEC and follow its regulations.
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC): The CFTC regulates derivatives and futures contracts, including those based on cryptocurrencies. This means trading in crypto futures and options falls under the CFTC’s purview.
- Internal Revenue Service (IRS): The IRS treats cryptocurrencies as property for tax purposes, requiring taxpayers to report gains or losses from crypto transactions.
- Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN): FinCEN enforces anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) regulations, requiring crypto businesses to implement measures to prevent illicit activities.
The Financial Innovation and Technology (FIT) for the 21st Century Act
The FIT21 Act aims to establish a clear regulatory framework for digital assets in the U.S. It delineates responsibilities between the SEC and CFTC, providing clarity on which agency oversees specific digital assets. The act also introduces new registration categories for intermediaries dealing with digital assets.
State-Level Regulations: New York’s BitLicense
New York’s Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) introduced the BitLicense in 2015, requiring businesses engaged in virtual currency activities with New York residents to obtain a license. The BitLicense imposes strict requirements on capital reserves, AML compliance, and cybersecurity measures. While intended to protect consumers, some argue it stifles innovation and deters crypto businesses from operating in New York.
B. Canada: Embracing Crypto with Caution
Regulatory Oversight by the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA)
The CSA provides a coordinated approach to regulating crypto assets across Canada’s provinces and territories. It requires crypto asset trading platforms (CTPs) to register as securities dealers if they facilitate trading in crypto assets that are securities or derivatives.
Requirements for Crypto Trading Platforms and Custodians
- Registration: CTPs must register with the appropriate securities regulator, ensuring they meet standards for investor protection, financial reporting, and operational integrity.
- Custody: Custodians holding crypto assets on behalf of clients must adhere to stringent requirements, including segregation of assets and robust security measures.
- Pre-Registration Undertakings (PRUs): Unregistered CTPs operating in Canada are required to provide PRUs, committing to compliance with regulatory expectations while their registration applications are under review..
United Kingdom: Post-Brexit Regulatory Developments
The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) Approach to Crypto Regulation
Post-Brexit, the United Kingdom has been developing its own regulatory framework for crypto-assets, distinct from the EU’s MiCA. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has taken a proactive role in this process, focusing on mitigating risks while supporting beneficial technological advancements. The FCA requires firms offering crypto services to register and comply with anti-money laundering regulations.
In its discussion paper DP25/1, the FCA outlines its approach to regulating various cryptoasset activities, including trading platforms, intermediaries, lending and borrowing, staking, and decentralized finance. The paper seeks industry feedback to develop a regulatory regime that promotes market integrity and consumer protection.
Upcoming Regulations and Their Potential Impact on the Industry
The UK government has proposed new legislation to bring crypto-assets within the scope of existing financial regulations. This includes extending regulatory oversight to crypto exchanges, dealers, and agents, aligning the UK’s approach more closely with that of the United States. The aim is to crack down on bad actors while fostering legitimate innovation in the sector.
One notable aspect of the proposed regulations is the exemption of overseas stablecoin issuers from the requirement to obtain UK authorization, provided they do not have a physical presence in the country. This move is intended to enhance cooperation with the US and position the UK as a favorable environment for crypto businesses.
These regulatory developments are expected to provide greater clarity and security for investors, potentially boosting confidence in the UK’s crypto market. However, industry participants have emphasized the need for balanced and timely implementation to ensure the UK remains competitive in the global crypto landscape.
Asia: Diverse Approaches to Crypto Regulation
China: A Firm Stance Against Decentralized Cryptocurrencies
Complete Ban on Cryptocurrency Activities
China has taken a stringent approach by declaring all cryptocurrency transactions illegal. The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) has prohibited financial institutions and payment companies from offering services related to cryptocurrencies, effectively banning trading and mining activities within the country.
Promotion of the Digital Yuan
In place of decentralized cryptocurrencies, China has been actively promoting its Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), known as the Digital Yuan or e-CNY. This digital currency aims to enhance financial sovereignty and provide a state-controlled alternative to cryptocurrencies. By the end of June 2024, transactions using the Digital Yuan reached approximately 7 trillion yuan (about $986 billion).
Japan: Structured and Progressive Regulation
Regulatory Framework Under the Payment Services Act
Japan has established a comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies through the Payment Services Act (PSA). This legislation defines crypto-assets and sets out requirements for their exchange and management, ensuring consumer protection and financial stability.
Licensing Requirements for Crypto Exchanges
Crypto exchanges operating in Japan must register with the Financial Services Agency (FSA) and adhere to strict compliance measures, including Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols. Additionally, exchanges are required to maintain a physical presence in Japan, have a local representative, and meet capital requirements.
South Korea: Emphasizing Transparency and Compliance
Mandatory Real-Name Accounts and AML Measures
South Korea mandates that cryptocurrency transactions be conducted through real-name bank accounts linked to crypto exchanges. This policy aims to prevent money laundering and ensure transparency in the crypto market.
Taxation Policies on Crypto Gains
Initially planning to impose a 20% tax on cryptocurrency gains exceeding 2.5 million won, South Korea has postponed the implementation of this tax to 2027. The delay reflects ongoing debates about the appropriate regulatory approach to the rapidly evolving crypto market.
India: Navigating Regulatory Uncertainty
Taxation of Crypto Assets and Introduction of the Digital Rupee
India has introduced a 30% tax on income from the transfer of virtual digital assets, including cryptocurrencies and Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Additionally, a 1% Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) is applied to transactions exceeding specified thresholds.
Concurrently, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is piloting the Digital Rupee, aiming to provide a regulated digital currency alternative.
Ongoing Debates on Comprehensive Crypto Legislation
Despite the taxation measures, India lacks a comprehensive legal framework governing cryptocurrencies. The Supreme Court has declined to consider petitions seeking clear regulations, leaving the industry in a state of uncertainty.
Want to launch a secure and scalable crypto project?
Middle East and Africa: Emerging Regulatory Frameworks
United Arab Emirates: A Crypto-Friendly Hub
The United Arab Emirates (UAE), particularly Dubai, has positioned itself as a forward-thinking jurisdiction for virtual assets.
VARA: Pioneering Virtual Asset Regulation
Established in 2022, the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) is the world’s first independent regulator dedicated to virtual assets. VARA oversees the regulation, licensing, and governance of virtual assets across Dubai, excluding the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) .
Comprehensive Licensing Framework
VARA offers a structured licensing regime for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), encompassing activities such as exchange services, custody, advisory, and brokerage . Applicants undergo a two-step process, ensuring adherence to stringent compliance and risk management standards.
Recent Regulatory Updates
In May 2025, VARA introduced Version 2.0 of its activity-based Rulebooks, enhancing market integrity and risk oversight. Key updates include:
- Margin Trading Restrictions: Only qualified and institutional investors can engage in margin trading, with retail clients excluded.
- Collateral Requirements: Service providers must maintain sufficient collateral to meet client obligations, adhering to strict initial and maintenance margin requirements.
- Unified Compliance Standards: Clarification of definitions related to digital asset collateral agreements and standardized compliance requirements across all licensed activities.
Nigeria: High Adoption Amid Regulatory Uncertainty
Nigeria stands out in Africa for its significant cryptocurrency adoption, driven by factors such as currency devaluation and limited access to traditional banking.
Central Bank’s Evolving Stance
In February 2021, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) prohibited financial institutions from facilitating cryptocurrency transactions, citing concerns over money laundering and terrorism financing . This move pushed crypto activities to peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms.
Recognizing the limitations of this approach, the CBN lifted the ban in December 2023, introducing guidelines for banks to open accounts for crypto service providers. This shift aimed to regulate virtual asset activities while mitigating associated risks.
SEC’s Regulatory Developments
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of Nigeria has also been proactive. In 2022, it issued the Digital Assets Rules, defining virtual assets and setting out requirements for their issuance, offering, and custody . However, the operationalization of these rules has faced challenges, partly due to overlapping mandates with the CBN.
Crackdown on P2P Trading
In May 2024, the Nigerian government proposed banning P2P trading of the naira to curb currency manipulation and stabilize the exchange rate. This move reflects ongoing efforts to balance innovation with financial stability .
Latin America: Innovation Driven by Necessity
A. El Salvador: Bitcoin as Legal Tender
From Bold Experiment to Strategic Retreat
In September 2021, El Salvador made headlines by becoming the first country to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender, aiming to enhance financial inclusion and reduce remittance costs. The government introduced the Chivo Wallet, offering $30 in Bitcoin to users, and mandated businesses to accept the cryptocurrency.
Challenges and Outcomes
Despite initial enthusiasm, the adoption faced hurdles:
- Limited Usage: Surveys indicated that a significant portion of the population did not use the Chivo Wallet beyond the initial incentive.
- Technical Issues: The Chivo Wallet experienced technical glitches, leading to user dissatisfaction.
- Economic Concerns: The volatility of Bitcoin raised concerns about financial stability, prompting the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to advise caution.
By early 2025, El Salvador scaled back its Bitcoin initiative, removing its status as legal tender in exchange for a $1.4 billion loan from the IMF.
B. Brazil: Developing a Regulatory Framework
Structured Approach to Crypto Regulation
Brazil has taken a methodical approach to cryptocurrency regulation:
- Legal Framework: Law No. 14.478/2022 and Decree No. 11.563/2023 established the foundation for regulating Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), requiring them to obtain authorization from the Central Bank of Brazil (BCB).
- Regulatory Bodies: The BCB oversees VASPs, while the Securities and Exchange Commission of Brazil (CVM) regulates crypto assets classified as securities.
- Compliance Requirements: VASPs must adhere to Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols, aligning with international standards.
Ongoing Developments
The BCB is engaging in public consultations to refine the regulatory framework, aiming to address aspects like asset segregation, risk management, and cybersecurity.
Oceania: Proactive Regulatory Measures
Australia: Comprehensive Oversight
ASIC’s Evolving Role
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is at the forefront of regulating crypto assets. Their approach focuses on ensuring that crypto offerings align with existing financial product definitions. This means that if a crypto asset resembles a financial product, it must comply with relevant regulations.
Registration and Compliance for Crypto Exchanges
Crypto exchanges operating in Australia are required to register with the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC). This registration mandates adherence to anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) obligations, including customer identification and reporting suspicious transactions.
New Zealand: Emphasis on Consumer Protection
FMA’s Approach to Crypto Regulation
In New Zealand, the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) oversees crypto-related activities. Their guidance emphasizes that while crypto assets are not inherently regulated, certain activities involving them may fall under existing financial services laws. For instance, if a crypto asset functions similarly to a financial product, it may be subject to regulatory oversight.
Guidance for Businesses and Investors
The FMA encourages businesses to engage proactively, seeking clarity on how their crypto-related activities align with current regulations. For investors, the FMA advises caution, highlighting the risks associated with crypto investments and the importance of understanding the nature of the assets involved
Conclusion
Navigating the patchwork of global crypto regulations is no small feat for developers aiming to launch or scale their coin projects. Each jurisdiction brings its own expectations, from licensing and taxation to consumer protections and operational compliance. Whether it’s the structured oversight of Australia’s ASIC, the evolving MiCA regulations in the EU, or the cautious stance taken by India and the U.S., understanding the local rules is key to staying ahead and building sustainable, legally sound projects. As the regulatory landscape continues to shift, working with experts becomes essential. Blockchain App Factory provides crypto development services tailored to align with global compliance standards, helping you build and launch secure, regulation-ready digital assets anywhere in the world.
