A Deep Dive into Token Standards: ERC-20, BEP-20, TRC-20, and More

Token standards are the backbone of the blockchain economy, enabling seamless creation, transfer, and integration of digital assets across decentralized applications. From Ethereum’s widely adopted ERC-20 to Binance Smart Chain’s efficient BEP-20 and TRON’s cost-effective TRC-20, each standard plays a pivotal role in shaping how tokens function within their ecosystems. With the rise of new protocols like Solana’s SPL and Bitcoin’s experimental BRC-20, the landscape is becoming more diverse and innovative. This guide explores these major and emerging token standards, helping you understand their differences, use cases, and how they’re powering the next wave of blockchain innovation.

Demystifying Token Standards

What Are Token Standards?

Token standards are essentially the foundational protocols that govern how tokens behave on a blockchain. They outline the rules that developers must follow when creating and issuing tokens on a specific network. This ensures that all tokens behave predictably and can interact seamlessly with wallets, exchanges, and smart contracts. Without token standards, the decentralized ecosystem would be fragmented, making interoperability between applications incredibly difficult. Think of them as the blueprint for how digital assets should function in a shared blockchain environment.

The Role of Token Standards in Ensuring Consistency Across Platforms

Token standards are not just about structure—they’re about enabling an entire digital economy to function smoothly. When developers adhere to a common set of rules, it allows different applications, wallets, and decentralized exchanges (DEXs) to work harmoniously with any compliant token. This consistency fuels the growth of DeFi, NFT marketplaces, and blockchain-based games. Whether you’re sending USDT from one wallet to another or interacting with a dApp using a governance token, it’s the token standard that ensures it all works without friction.

Evolution of Token Standards in Response to Technological Advancements

As blockchain technology has rapidly advanced, so too have the standards that support it. The early days saw the dominance of ERC-20, which was revolutionary for fungible tokens. Then came standards like ERC-721 for NFTs and ERC-1155 for multi-token functionality—allowing a single contract to manage both fungible and non-fungible tokens. In parallel, other blockchains like Binance Smart Chain (BSC) and TRON introduced BEP-20 and TRC-20 respectively, adapting the logic of ERC-20 to suit their unique infrastructures. The result is a diverse, multi-chain landscape where new standards continue to emerge to solve challenges like scalability, flexibility, and transaction speed.

Deep Dive into ERC-20: Ethereum’s Pioneering Standard

Origins and Development of the ERC-20 Standard

ERC-20 was introduced by Ethereum developer Fabian Vogelsteller in 2015 and quickly became the gold standard for fungible tokens. The idea was to simplify token creation while ensuring a consistent structure for interaction across Ethereum-based apps. Its impact can’t be overstated—ERC-20 laid the groundwork for the Initial Coin Offering (ICO) boom of 2017 and remains the most widely used token standard in crypto history. It’s been foundational for projects ranging from DeFi protocols to stablecoins and blockchain-based startups.

Core Functionalities and Technical Specifications

At the core of the ERC-20 standard is a smart contract interface that defines six mandatory functions and three optional ones. These include:

  • totalSupply: This shows the total number of tokens that have been created overall.
  • balanceOf: This tells you how many tokens a particular wallet or address owns.
  • transfer: This is used to send tokens directly from your wallet to someone else’s.
  • approve: This lets you give permission to another person or smart contract to spend some of your tokens.
  • transferFrom: This is used to move tokens from one wallet to another, but only if permission was already given with approval.
  • allowance: This tells you how many tokens someone is still allowed to spend on your behalf after you’ve given them permission.

Advantages: Widespread Adoption and Robust Developer Community

The strengths of ERC-20 is its unparalleled adoption. Thanks to its standardized format, developers can integrate ERC-20 tokens into wallets, exchanges, and dApps with minimal customization. This has created a vibrant ecosystem with thousands of ERC-20 tokens and tools. From community support to pre-built libraries, developers building on Ethereum benefit from a rich infrastructure and a massive knowledge base that accelerates innovation and reduces development time.

Challenges: Scalability Issues and High Gas Fees

Despite its success, ERC-20 isn’t without limitations. Ethereum’s network congestion and high gas fees have long been a pain point for users and developers alike. During peak usage, even a simple token transfer can cost several dollars, making microtransactions infeasible. Additionally, ERC-20 tokens rely heavily on Ethereum’s proof-of-stake chain, which, while more efficient than its former proof-of-work system, still struggles with high demand. These issues have prompted the rise of alternative standards and layer-2 scaling solutions like Optimism and Arbitrum.

Real-World Applications and Prominent ERC-20 Tokens

ERC-20 tokens are at the heart of many real-world blockchain applications. Some notable examples include:

  • USDT (Tether): One of the most widely used stablecoins, used for trading, remittances, and DeFi.
  • DAI: A decentralized stablecoin managed by MakerDAO that maintains its peg through algorithmic mechanisms.
  • LINK (Chainlink): A critical infrastructure token that powers decentralized oracles for feeding real-world data into smart contracts.
  • UNI (Uniswap): The governance token of the Uniswap DEX, enabling community-led protocol decisions.

Exploring BEP-20: Binance Smart Chain’s Answer to ERC-20

Introduction to Binance Smart Chain (BSC) and Its Objectives

Binance Smart Chain, commonly known as BSC, was launched by Binance in September 2020 to address Ethereum’s growing congestion and rising transaction costs. Designed as a parallel blockchain to Binance Chain, BSC introduces support for smart contracts and EVM (Ethereum Virtual Machine) compatibility. Its main goal is to offer a scalable, developer-friendly, and cost-efficient environment for launching decentralized applications and digital assets. In essence, BSC provides a faster and cheaper alternative to Ethereum while still supporting many of the same tools and token mechanics.

Comparison Between BEP-20 and ERC-20 Standards

BEP-20 is BSC’s native token standard and shares a striking resemblance to Ethereum’s ERC-20. Both define essential rules that tokens must follow, such as how they are transferred, approved, and tracked across wallets and smart contracts. However, BEP-20 enhances flexibility with extended functionality, such as optional metadata fields and minting/burning capabilities. It also integrates seamlessly with both Binance Chain and Binance DEX, offering cross-chain operability that ERC-20 doesn’t natively support. This compatibility allows BEP-20 tokens to be wrapped versions of ERC-20 tokens and used more efficiently across ecosystems.

Benefits: Lower Transaction Fees and Faster Processing Times

BSC’s standout advantages lies in its performance. Transactions on Binance Smart Chain are notably faster, typically taking about 3 seconds per block, compared to Ethereum’s average of 12–15 seconds. Moreover, gas fees on BSC are substantially lower, often costing mere cents rather than dollars. This cost-effectiveness is a huge plus for DeFi protocols and dApps with high-volume or microtransaction needs. The improved speed and affordability have made BSC an attractive choice for users and developers seeking a smoother experience without compromising on features.

Considerations: Centralization Concerns and Ecosystem Maturity

While BSC offers significant technical and economic benefits, it comes with trade-offs. A key concern is its level of centralization. BSC operates using a Proof of Staked Authority (PoSA) consensus mechanism, which limits the number of validators to just 21—many of which are reportedly affiliated with Binance. This setup raises questions about decentralization and potential censorship. Additionally, although BSC has quickly gained popularity, its ecosystem is still catching up with Ethereum in terms of developer activity, third-party integrations, and community maturity.

Use Cases and Notable BEP-20 Tokens

BEP-20 tokens power a wide range of applications on BSC, especially in sectors like DeFi, NFTs, and blockchain gaming. Some high-visibility BEP-20 tokens include:

  • BNB (Build and Build): Used for gas fees on BSC and staking in governance processes.
  • BUSD (Binance USD): A US dollar-pegged stablecoin fully backed by reserves, ideal for low-volatility trading and saving.
  • CAKE: The native token of PancakeSwap, a leading DEX that offers staking, farming, and lottery services.
  • XVS: The governance token of Venus Protocol, a decentralized money market for lending and borrowing.

Planning to launch your own crypto token?

Get Started Now

Understanding TRC-20: TRON’s Efficient Token Standard

Overview of the TRON Blockchain and Its Mission

TRON is a high-performance blockchain platform founded by entrepreneur Justin Sun in 2017. Its core mission is to decentralize the internet by giving content creators full ownership of their data and direct monetization capabilities without relying on intermediaries. TRON distinguishes itself through its emphasis on scalability, low transaction costs, and user-friendly tools for developers. Its fast-growing ecosystem includes entertainment platforms, DeFi apps, and file-sharing systems—all powered by native and custom tokens, including those based on its TRC-20 standard.

Technical Aspects and Features of the TRC-20 Standard

TRC-20 is TRON’s answer to Ethereum’s ERC-20, built to offer similar functionality with significant enhancements in speed and cost. Tokens built using TRC-20 can be transferred, authorized, and tracked just like their ERC-20 counterparts, but with far lower fees and higher network capacity. These tokens are governed by smart contracts executed on the TRON Virtual Machine (TVM), which supports Solidity—making it easy for Ethereum developers to port projects over. TRC-20’s architecture allows fast and programmable asset creation with almost instant finality.

Advantages: High Throughput and Minimal Transaction Costs

One of TRON’s most praised features is its ability to process thousands of transactions per second (TPS). This is a significant upgrade over Ethereum, which struggles with scalability under heavy loads. Additionally, TRON’s network fees are extremely low, often fractions of a cent, making it perfect for applications like tipping, microtransactions, and real-time rewards. These capabilities make TRC-20 a natural fit for high-volume decentralized apps and services that require both speed and affordability.

Limitations: Ecosystem Size and Developer Adoption

Despite its technical merits, TRON faces hurdles in terms of ecosystem scale and perception. Compared to Ethereum and even Binance Smart Chain, TRON has fewer active developers, less diversity in dApps, and relatively modest community engagement outside Asia. Some developers also raise concerns about TRON’s governance model and marketing-centric approach. However, with growing support for NFTs, DeFi, and cross-chain integrations, TRON is steadily carving out a unique niche.

Key Applications and Popular TRC-20 Tokens

TRC-20 tokens are actively used in a variety of real-world applications. Some notable examples include:

  • USDT (Tether): TRON hosts a large portion of USDT supply, benefiting from the low fees and fast transfers ideal for arbitrage and trading.
  • BTT (BitTorrent Token): Powers the decentralized file-sharing ecosystem developed from BitTorrent’s integration with TRON.
  • WIN (WINkLink): Serves as the utility token for TRON’s decentralized oracle service, connecting smart contracts with real-world data.

Comparative Analysis: ERC-20 vs. BEP-20 vs. TRC-20

Side-by-Side Comparison of Technical Specifications

ERC-20 tokens are native to the Ethereum blockchain and follow a standardized protocol for fungible assets. BEP-20 tokens, built on Binance Smart Chain (BSC), are modeled after ERC-20 but with added flexibility for minting and burning. TRC-20 tokens are designed for the TRON network and offer nearly identical functionality to ERC-20 but are executed within the TRON Virtual Machine. Each standard enables smart contracts and programmable logic, with ERC-20 and BEP-20 offering extensive wallet and exchange support. TRC-20, while functionally similar, is slightly behind in terms of third-party tool integration, although it continues to grow.

Assessment of Transaction Speeds, Fees, and Scalability

Ethereum, which uses the ERC-20 standard, can process about 15 transactions per second. This limitation often results in network congestion and high gas fees during peak usage. In contrast, Binance Smart Chain handles transactions much faster—roughly every 3 seconds—while maintaining significantly lower fees, making it more accessible for small-scale users and frequent transactions. TRON outpaces both by offering throughput of up to 2,000 transactions per second with virtually zero transaction costs, making it ideal for use cases like micropayments and frequent transfers.

Evaluation of Security Measures and Decentralization Levels

ERC-20 benefits from Ethereum’s decentralized infrastructure, backed by thousands of validators across the globe. This level of decentralization enhances both network security and trust. BSC, on the other hand, uses a Proof of Staked Authority (PoSA) model with only 21 validators, many linked to Binance, which raises concerns about centralized control. TRON employs a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) system with 27 elected super representatives—more decentralized than BSC, but still less so than Ethereum.

Interoperability and Cross-Chain Compatibility

ERC-20 tokens are widely supported and can be used across countless Ethereum-based dApps, wallets, and DeFi platforms. BEP-20 tokens are compatible with Ethereum tools thanks to their structural similarity, and BSC’s dual-chain architecture allows some cross-chain movement between BSC and Binance Chain. TRC-20 tokens are primarily limited to the TRON ecosystem, although efforts are underway to bridge TRON with other major blockchains through cross-chain protocols.

Suitability for Various Applications and Industries

ERC-20 is the go-to choice for projects that prioritize decentralization, security, and deep liquidity—especially within the DeFi space. BEP-20 is well-suited for use cases that require quick settlement and low fees, such as blockchain gaming, tokenized rewards, and real-time payments. TRC-20’s ultra-low fees and fast speeds make it ideal for applications involving micropayments, such as digital tipping, content monetization, and on-chain subscriptions.

Beyond the Big Three: Emerging Token Standards

Introduction to Newer Standards: SPL (Solana) and BRC-20 (Bitcoin)

Solana’s SPL standard powers tokens on the high-performance Solana blockchain. It supports both fungible and non-fungible tokens and benefits from Solana’s reputation for high throughput and minimal transaction latency. Meanwhile, BRC-20 is a recent innovation on the Bitcoin network, introduced via the Ordinals protocol. It allows users to mint and transfer tokens without the need for smart contracts, marking a major step toward making Bitcoin programmable.

Innovations and Unique Features of These Emerging Standards

SPL stands out by merging features from both ERC-20 and ERC-721, allowing developers to issue multi-functional tokens with unmatched speed and efficiency. The Solana chain’s architecture supports thousands of transactions per second, ideal for large-scale dApps. BRC-20, while experimental, pushes the boundaries of Bitcoin’s functionality by introducing token issuance on a chain traditionally limited to simple transfers.

Potential Impact on the Future of Decentralized Applications

The SPL standard has already attracted a growing number of DeFi and NFT projects, suggesting Solana could emerge as a top-tier smart contract platform. Meanwhile, BRC-20 has ignited a wave of interest in Bitcoin’s utility beyond store-of-value applications. If widely adopted, these emerging standards could reshape the token landscape by offering developers more tailored tools suited to high-performance or legacy chain environments.

Conclusion

In today’s rapidly evolving blockchain ecosystem, understanding token standards like ERC-20, BEP-20, and TRC-20—as well as emerging ones like SPL and BRC-20—is essential for developers, investors, and enterprises aiming to build efficient, scalable, and interoperable decentralized applications. Each standard brings unique advantages, from Ethereum’s security and decentralization to BSC’s speed and affordability, and TRON’s microtransaction efficiency. Meanwhile, newer standards are expanding the boundaries of what tokens can do on alternative chains. As the landscape continues to diversify, selecting the right token standard becomes a critical strategic decision. Blockchain App Factory provides Token Development Services to help you navigate these options and launch high-performance, future-ready tokens tailored to your project’s needs.

Talk To Our Experts

To hire the top blockchain experts from Blockchain App Factory send us your requirement and other relevant details via the form attached underneath.

+91 63826 65366

[email protected]

WhatsApp: +916382665366

Skype: james_25587

Get in Touch